Jump to content

Recommended Posts

#4 looks interesting.  It might be Pelt Multicolor Swirl.  That would be a swirly Pelt Mutlicolor Rainbo, possibly from the NLR era.  Very desirable if that's what it turns out to be.

Put #6 in your Vitro group.

#8 might have been intended as a game marble, so that's where I'd put it.  

I'd put the rest with your general West Virginia Swirls. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the input Steph, Al and Paul. I do appreciate it. I will post some more shots of #2. I was also wondering if #8 might be a little flamy. I'll post another one of it also. Thanks again for looking and commenting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re #8:  The underlying swirl in the mostly solid color marbles can be interesting.  However ... I wouldn't put it in with a flame lot.  I'm still seeing _essentially_ a solid color.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few more of #8 also. Thanks for looking. It stays in the game marble pile unless you tell me something different. 

Thanks Steph.

Paul and Al, I appreciate your help. Thanks

Paul, check your email if you haven't already.

Thanks

IMG_5616.JPG

IMG_5631.JPG

IMG_5600.JPG

IMG_5637.JPG

IMG_5632.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, 8 is showing more white than I thought from the original photos.  If it is not too hard to see it in hand, I guess put it in the transparent swirl pile ....

I wouldn't bill it as a flame in any case.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Steph. I remembered you telling me that it had to be 4 flames together to be a flame so I wasn't sure if those were flames.

I appreciate the help. I'm going to post a special one of a kind mystery marble next. Let me know what you think.

thanks again

Jjay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure, but I don't think transparent swirls would usually get put in the flame category.

And one thing about the spirit of the flame is you don't want it to be something that someone has to work hard to see.  Flames kinda need to be in your face -- the kind of marble which speaks for itself.  ... does that makes sense?  It's an art, not a science, as they say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see that differently.

For me there is no difference in the pattern between opaque or transparant flame swirls.

I put my transp- flame swirls in the flame category.

Jjay's marble is not a real flame,with only 3 flame tips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...