-
Posts
2364 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
41
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Posts posted by Roberto
-
-
52 minutes ago, akroorka said:
Image #4 and #5--is that a true Carnelean? Pretty cool!
I think it is a real cornelian, since it is not very 'special,' but I have never researched these things
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yes for the first two, I have a bit of doubt about the last one....seems imperial
-
1
-
1
-
-
X2
-
1
-
1
-
-
Correct
-
1
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, Alta said:
Grazie a entrambi. Avete qualche idea su cosa potrebbe essere?
If it weren't for the measurements being so large, I would (perhaps) have attributed this to a 'Peltier Boyce second run 2001' cat's eye, weak, but those only reach a maximum of 0.669 (17mm) or 0.708 (18mm)
I think it's a European marble, (perhaps) made in France?
They probably made similar marbles, but I'm just guessing...
Some images of a type of 'Peltier Boyce second run 2001', with a coloration similar to the op
-
1
-
1
-
-
Not whispler, even though it might have a weak, similar structure. Also, I assure you it would have been much more bubbly than this.
-
2
-
-
11 minutes ago, IowaMarble said:
Yes, that is the melted pontil that I was referring to. I have heard some collectors also call it a “belly button” pontil, but I believe melted pontil is the correct terminology here, although admittedly, I am far from being a glass artisan.
Ahaha, I had never heard this term "belly button", strong!
Thanks again, Chad, for confirming it
-
1
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, IowaMarble said:
100% an American handmade marble from one of Leighton’s many Ohio based business ventures. Note the patented melted pontil. Commonly referred to as a “Navarre” by collectors, although it would be very difficult to prove that it actually came from Leighton’s Navarre factory.
Thank you! I just wanted to point out that you can see a ring-shaped pontil, typical of Navarre.
-
1
-
-
-
This marble of about 0.708 inches (18mm), with obvious fire damage, I got some time ago from a guy who claimed to have found it in a junkyard.
Now, it was claimed to be MFC, but nothing for sure, any opinions?
Here is the boy's statement: "i dug this from an old land fill . Plymouth NH jul 2017 Approx 3-4 feet depth. Also pulled out a bunch of benningtons and mib shards. Land fill was from a massive fire burned 12 homes. Late 40s."
"The soil composition wat predominantly ash/charcoal. Almost all the glass in this horizon was melted. I had to dig through this to get to the pre 1900 dump"
I took some photos and videos,
-
1
-
-
22 minutes ago, IowaMarble said:
Un'altra bella Leighton "Navarre"! Grazie per averla condivisa, Roberto! Questa discussione contiene delle vere e proprie chicche per gli occhi americane d'epoca!
👍💪
-
1
-
-
-
No Vitro conqueror
-
1
-
-
Not imperial, In my opinion, they are both Akro
-
1
-
1
-
-
Vitro
-
1
-
1
-
-
With reference to the second photo, it could be Pelt, but I cannot say for sure here
Let's see other opinions...
-
1
-
-
Ravenswood-
That metallic could be an accidental deposit that occurred during production. It happens with many mibs
-
1
-



Dug? Akro?, Vitro?
in Marble I.D.'s
Posted
Thank you - I know people who go crazy over these mistakes. I don't go crazy, but I like them, just as Chad says, for their historical value!
However, if they are prized marbles (we know which ones), or not prized, but that include unique and particular features, I think the value can rise quite a bit. Then, the matter can be subjective.
Some Cairo Novelty errors, from excavation, followed by Ravenswood and DAS