Jump to content

Nate

Members
  • Posts

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nate

  1. 18 hours ago, Ric said:

    You need to be careful with what you read online. I have heard of Vitros and I have heard of Sparklers but I have never heard of a "Vitro Sparkler". 🙂

    I agree it is foreign, and tend to think Vacor, like Steph.

    Bit of a detour but this topic has been bugging me for a little while and I keep forgetting to make a post about it. Ron had posted a marble that he identified as a Vitro Sparkler a few years ago in a big Vitro ID thread on the AAM boards. The mib he posted does seem pretty different-looking from an Akro Sparkler, but it's been difficult to find more information about if these are indeed a thing or not, how to ID Vitro Sparkler vs. Akro Sparkler if they are a thing, etc etc. I know you know your Vitros, @Ric - maybe you can help demystify this one for me?

    Screenshot 2023-06-12 at 12.16.50 AM.png

  2. Good call @Steph. Came back because this one was bugging me and then I remembered that I have some. I am 100% confident they are Vitro Tri Lites. They are likely a bit larger than 5/8" but the ebay seller that Melissa's photo is from doesn't provide many details on their listings.

  3. 25 minutes ago, Carowill said:

    Marbles are unfortunately rarely black or white.  There are many shades of gray.  Not like a baseball card or coin for identification.  Grading is a bit like CAC marbles, where everyone thinks they have one, even when they don’t.  Everyone thinks they have a mint marble, even when they don’t.  There are some fairly good grading guidelines, but not everyone agrees and it seems to be subjective depending upon whether you are a buyer or seller.  I understand your pain, but even if a committee was formed, I seriously doubt there would be a large majority of collectors who would embrace their decisions.  When you read the threads on TMC or AAM, the experts are often very divided.  I was in medicine for 45 years and there is a saying, “ there’s no always and no never in medicine.”  Seems to be somewhat true with marbles.

    I definitely agree that the issue of identification is uniquely challenging when it comes to marbles. However, when it comes to authentication and grading, I think coins are just as complicated and subjective as marbles—if not more so. Before there were third-party grading and authentication companies for coins, dealers and collectors alike would rely entirely on their own subjective opinions for valuing coins. That's fine for those people with decades of experience, but it makes the barrier to entry extremely steep and discourages new collectors from joining the hobby. And even when ID is impossible for certain marbles, grading can often still be determined because it's a condition thing, not a maker or authentication thing.

    I really hope someone comes along and established a method of third-party grading, authenticating and identifying (when possible) for marbles. Without it, I think it will be difficult for marble collecting to survive and thrive beyond the next couple generations.

  4. 3 minutes ago, Fire1981 said:

    It doesn’t look like a Phantom Conqueror to me because it’s not a veneered marble 🔥

    Conquerors are veneered. Phantom Conquerors have a wispy white matrix.

    273198547_ScreenShot2022-08-29at12_07_54AM.thumb.png.539766c0691f5828393c98d98d90ea80.png

×
×
  • Create New...