KateSo

I’m not reading any of these replies and deleting my account. Again peace love and light to you all. 

3 hours ago, akroorka said:

Slow down KateSo,
I get it, the passion for an ID that you think is right, we all have it.
Rudeness is not a topic here from anyone. If you are convinced, well why post it for a further evaluation?
I have been called wrong plenty of times after much research. I just get Piss## at myself. 
Marbles ID can get quite frustrating, the quote that you show is regarding stone Agates.
I have researched plenty of marbles over the years—even the game marbles. The one that you show is a Master Made Game marble.
I/We welcome the passion that you show.
Sometime the truth is a hard swallow. You will always get the truth here at “The Marble Connection”.
I would be willing to trade you a “Brick” for this one just to settle you down. They are only marbles after all.
I appreciate your passion and contributions here.
Sometimes we must lay down and lick our wounds as far as ID goes. Live and learn for sure—keep an open mind, never be embarrassed.
Keep on Marbling!
Marble—On!!

Slow down.? All I did was ask a question and showed him where i read it says they’re handmade with tiny light flashes. Either way, I don’t care 🤷‍♀️ I just don’t like to title them as CAC Peltier Akro Vitro Oxblood Marble online like the rest. ✌🏻☮️

That’s what I was referring too, I came here to ask if anyone had seen one bc the message I received was rude. 

21 hours ago, Alan said:

If I am reading it correctly, your original post calls the presence of "aventurine" into some question.  While I don't see it as a brick - if you say its a brick with "aventurine", then its a brick with "Aventurine".  Assuming this assertion, then its not clear (to me anyway) what this post is about.  But I'll go with your assertion on it's ID.

11 minutes ago, Alan said:

Focus and exposure aren't good, but from those pics - not a brick.  And bricks don't have "aventurine".  Reflections can be anything including subsurface stars from impact/pressure.

If someone looks hard enough hoping for "aventurine", they will find it where it doesn't exist.

"Aventurine" desire is becoming a 17th century Dutch tulip craze thing.

Sooo you’re saying in essence I’m seeing something that isn’t there lol no, let me rephrase after receiving the message this morning I looked at it again outside (in the daylight) it’s not from damage. And again there’s something on the surface that gives off shine when hit by light in different angles. I don’t know why my phone pics aren’t good on here . I just found my camera charger. If I could post a video it would be easier to see when rotating in the light. I’ll upload better when I take them. 

I posted this marble to eBay the other day. Someone messaged me last night said none have AV. Maybe not but there’s definitely something on the surface that’s gives off shiny flashes in the light. The internet gives completely different answers when researching . Any help please. TIA . First few pics were taken under different lighting.58”

After looking closer at the blue one I think it’s a MFC bc of the seam . I could be wrong . 

19 hours ago, akroorka said:

I agree with Al.

You have to move your marbles off of the Lego Kit before taking an image.

It does no good for your images and throws them off a bit.

Try a Grey cloth like @Chad G.suggests.

Chad suggested this stuff to me a few years back and I will never look back.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07MNR63QC/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Cheap and lots of it--it takes a photo very well. Search around, you may find different colors.

Marble--On!!

I just ordered one lol thanks for sharing this!!!

Shia? Is that a name for one of them?

I have one similar and someone on here told me it was jabo . You would know better than me lol 

I agree with peltier. This is a sick marble. I love it! 

I have a similar one. Not sure what it is tho lol sorry 

The white is really bright.  .65”

I forgot to add more pics yesterday.  .61” 

I didn’t adjust the pics in anyway besides cropped them a little. First 4 were taken with diff lighting .

I didn’t do anything to the pics besides cropped a little. .67”

I’ll post better pics of them. 

Looks like a lighter shade than the tomato.

Back 4 Christensen?, 3 in front are they Peltier? .64” & .61” . I’ll add more pics 

It’s a process I’m still trying to perfect. I can’t find my cameras charger 🤷‍♀️ 

.61” 

3 hours ago, marblemanvintagemarbles said:

⅝" This one is different but it's tits 

Tits McGee. 

The ones I have are .58 and shooter. If I didn’t say I’d sell them I would peel them 😂 

Wait they look like this under the coating? Lol 

Has patch of white on I want to say black base glass. Different shades with each turn. .64”

5 hours ago, akroorka said:

Odd for sure Melissa!

I have never seen these before.

Are they Glass? KateSo?

Lets ask @Mojo for an opinion here.

I love the weird and cool.

@Al Oregon is another that has held some pretty weird marbles in his life.

I am bumfrickled here.

Nice find--Whatever these are.

If you are a seller post them please.

Marble--On!!

Yes they’re glass but I’m not sure how the coating is on them. Very unique. Yes for sale. Let me know 😊