New marbles. Slight better pics. I think.

[Djp5690]

ok. So I kind of found a system although the first pic looks real washed out compared to the second two. I know more pics would be better, but I salvaged what I could. Abd at this point, the pic taking practice is just as helpful as the id’s for me. 😆 

[Ric]

When you're taking pics, the simplest way to check your result is to look at the marble on your monitor and compare it to the marble in-hand. If they are different, take another picture. For a proper ID, it's often important that details of the pattern are clear and the colors are correct. Knowing the size can be helpful too.

[Ric]

The "New marbles" in your topic made me laugh, you sound like some of the German hand-made collector's I know. To them, anything machine-made is a "new marble". 😄

[Ric]

I'd say the 1st is Alley and 3rd-4th are Ravenswood. The 2nd may be Alley too. This is assuming they are all around 5/8".

[Djp5690]

16 hours ago, Ric said:

The "New marbles" in your topic made me laugh, you sound like some of the German hand-made collector's I know. To them, anything machine-made is a "new marble". 😄

😆 get off my lawn with all that new fangled machine glass!!!  I just meant they were a new submission!  I’m assuming these are, indeed, all vintage!  😆 but yes, perhaps poorly worded. Other than pic 1, this is probably a semi-solid representation of what these look like in hand. 
 

Thank you, and yea… all 5/8.