Jump to content

bumblebee

Admin
  • Posts

    4159
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by bumblebee

  1. This is far from a dead horse. If these are authentic, what does it matter whether they were dug up or from ex-employees? In either case, if the original finders would tell the truth and provide a shred of evidence, the value of these would skyrocket. Heck, even I would buy one. I find it impossible to fathom why they would not do this, since it would be honest, historically invaluable, boost their value, and shut people like me up once and for all and polish some of the tarnish this episode has brought--seemingly unnecessarily--onto the hobby.

    To me it seems to have grown the crazy legs similar to a treasure story. I feel like at any time we're going to hear that the original finders mysteriously disappeared in the deserts of Mexico while on vacation, or that these were actually discovered in the Roswell wreckage by a rancher and were presumably the playtoys of alien children.

  2. I just find it odd that the people who believe and insist that they are real have no knowledge of their true origin. If they are real, then why didn't CAC make more like this?

    Were these like their last run before they closed down that they gave away to employees at the last party?

    If these were "the best of the best" that some employee secretly squirreled away, wouldn't someone at some point have said, "Bob, these are gorgeous. Let's make more like this so we can sell them." ?

  3. If they are authentic, then why the secrecy and hush-hush? In a hobby where every scrap of history and provenance is precious and eagerly devoured by hard core collectors, why do the origins of these remain a mystery after so many years? Clearly whoever found them has refused to reveal where/how/when despite the criticism from marble collectors and historians, and surely there must be more than one individual involved and colluding. They clearly have something important to hide. These are the only reasons I can fathom the secrecy if they are indeed legit:

    1) Someone obtained them illegally (dug up) and doesn't want to get in trouble.

    2) So many were found (dug or from an ex-employee) that they aren't willing to reveal the full scope of the find in order to protect their market value. (This seems like a contradiction, though, since hiding their origin is in fact harming their market value to a degree.)

    3) The finder is trying to protect their privacy and security. This seems like a good reason, but in that case orchestrating a simple anonymous press release with a photo or two of the find would not threaten anyone's privacy or security and would greatly benefit the community. Surely whoever decided not to reveal their origin made a blunder, whether the marbles be legit or not.

    Those are all the reasons I can think of obscuring their origins if they are in fact legitimate. Does anyone have other reasons?

    If they are not authentic, then the mystery and secrecy makes perfect sense.

  4. I was contacted about this collection two weeks ago by two young men from Phoenix. I talked to them on the phone but got a weird feeling. I have phone numbers and email addresses.

    They sent pictures in an email and I immediately recognized them as Bo's.

    The fact that you have their e-mail addresses should be enough to track them down. In fact the e-mail they sent you would likely have enough information to track what residence they were at when they sent it (with help from their Internet Service Provider), unless they sent it from a public library or coffee shop type location.

  5. If that is mint, it is probably worth $80, assuming it is a black opaque base. However, it might have a transparent blue base lke the one i just found, and that my friend gets you in a whole new ball park. That being said if it is 200 total and they make you happy, then go for it!

    Craig

    Thanks, that's exactly the kind of feedback I was looking for. Right now $200 wouldn't make me too happy. ;)
  6. I have a chance to buy a small box of marbles, mostly common except for three tri-color corkscrews and one nice red-based hand-gathered, plus this 5/8"ish CAC winking at me. They are antique dealers who insist everything is mint, but I can clearly see flea bites on at least half of the marbles. Still I doubt they're going far below $200. And I have to drive almost 90 minutes just to look at them.

    Would you spend the gas $$$ to see if this guy is truly mint? Seeing how they're all rolling together in the same box I'm doubtful.

    post-1926-129885799319_thumb.jpg

  7. This one looks so great "wet" it sure would be nice to not have to use a spray bottle to really appreciate it.

    I've read elsewhere that some type of clear coat can just about achieve this look. What are the risks and are the results worth it? Any particular types or brands, like Minwax?

    A few months back I tried the jeweler's rouge cloth but it never worked for me. Good finger exercises though.

    post-1926-128068688951_thumb.jpg

    post-1926-128068690332_thumb.jpg

  8. Today I paid about $1/lb for a two-gallon fish bowl filled to the brim with marbles belonging to a local marble champ from the 1950s. It was heavy. They were happy to sell it to "someone who cared."

    Marbles were all pre-1960s and played with. Lots of surface wear of the sort where if you dip them in water they look mint, but the fog returns once they dry. Only a handful or two were truly mint, but it was great fun sorting through them and imagining the battles the champ won on those hot, dusty playgrounds to collect this horde.

    Near the bottom of the bowl the fellow on the bottom left corner of the group pictured here rolled out and instantly caught my eye. "That's an interesting brushed patch," I thought to myself. But then as I brought it closer I knew it was special. Those seams, those colors. Not just on the surface but dipping into the transparent base.

    Sure it's a bit worn but a little spray of water makes it darn near "wet" mint, and that's likely the wettest mint of that breed I'll ever afford. ;) As a bonus it looks like I found a cousin or two in there to keep him (her?) company.

    Out here in Southern California, where the antique stores sell cat-eyes for $1 each and the flea markets have no fleas, I consider this a score.

    post-1926-12806407942_thumb.jpg

    post-1926-128064080132_thumb.jpg

    post-1926-128064093678_thumb.jpg

  9. How about a new nickname for some MFC marbles?

    AKRON, Jan. 13, 1917—M. F. Christensen, president and general manager of the M. F. Christensen and Son company, manufacturers of glass marbles, was ordered late yesterday to pay his wife $10 weekly temporary alimony pending the hearing of their divorce suit. Mrs. Esta Ellena Christensen filed the divorce action charging cruelty and neglect.

    Attorney M. Schultz, Cleveland attorney for Mrs. Christensen, charged the evidence would show Christensen's fondness for other women. He said Christensen frequently kissed his stenographer "good night" and that he was known to have dropped marbles on the floor and then grasp her knee while he stooped to pick them up. On another occasion, Shultz said, Christensen's stenographer lifted her dress to show him her new garters. Christensen's attorney said Mrs. Christensen hired women detectives to trail her husband.

×
×
  • Create New...