LevvyPoole Posted December 31, 2024 Report Share Posted December 31, 2024 Hi, I really love these 3 and would like to know more about them if anyone can help? They are extremely reactive under UV 395. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nickel Guy Posted December 31, 2024 Report Share Posted December 31, 2024 Hi, I'd like to say welcome to the MarbleConnection site but I don't know who made your neat trio. Somebody will soon enough. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melissa Posted December 31, 2024 Report Share Posted December 31, 2024 These look vitro to me. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akroorka Posted December 31, 2024 Report Share Posted December 31, 2024 4 hours ago, LevvyPoole said: They are extremely reactive under UV 395. I know UV but 395 is not in my venacular--please explain this. These marbles remind me of something that I never really got cleared up as far as I can remember. I think Vitro, many thought Akro. This type came in some "Victory" marked "jobber boxes" boxes marketed during the "Bicentennial". The colors are very close to what I found in a Vitro "Fisher Jewel Tray" involving helmets. I will show some images below. I think that the OP are Vitro marbles Marble--On!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LevvyPoole Posted December 31, 2024 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2024 Thanks for your response. Uv 395 is the wavelength of uv light that I used. Yes, I think I'm swaying towards vitro too actually, as I have spotted very similar shades and patterns on some others... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Posted January 1 Report Share Posted January 1 On 12/31/2024 at 4:48 PM, akroorka said: I know UV but 395 is not in my venacular--please explain this. (Unfortunately, I have chosen to remove this safety content due to unchecked behaviors by others on this board. My apologies to those who will not benefit from it in the future.) 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akroorka Posted January 1 Report Share Posted January 1 14 minutes ago, Alan said: Its a type of higher power UV light. Good stuff Alan--Thankyou! Happy NewYear👀. I have been treating Glacouma since my early fourties🕶️--this info counts for sure. Marble--On!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LevvyPoole Posted January 2 Author Report Share Posted January 2 And the plot thickens...? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LevvyPoole Posted January 2 Author Report Share Posted January 2 On 1/1/2025 at 12:54 AM, Alan said: Its a type of higher power UV light. Lately, more people are buying cheap, high power UV lights while ignoring the eye safety issues that come with their use. Looking at 395 and 365 without safety glasses over time leads to cataracts or macular degeneration. Most people seem to ignore this FWIW. Thanks for this information, I knew as far as to not shine it directly in my eyes but this is definitely something I will take note of. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Posted January 2 Report Share Posted January 2 On 1/2/2025 at 1:54 PM, LevvyPoole said: Thanks for this information, I knew as far as to not shine it directly in my eyes but this is definitely something I will take note of. (Unfortunately, I have chosen to remove this ID content due to unchecked behaviors by others on this board. My apologies to those who will not benefit from it in the future. Perhaps someone with an understanding of UV light safety on human eyes will step in to fill my absence) 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now