Jump to content

Steph

Supporting Member Moderator
  • Posts

    29380
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    40

Posts posted by Steph

  1. I was happy this jar of peanut sauce wasn't not. There were maybe 4 different brands in the little store and I scoured the ingredients labels until I thought I had the best chance of a mild version.

    Was scared to even open it.

    So for now I'm enjoying the lack of chili ... later I'll probably get a chili craving again.

  2. Well i went over and had a look.

    Here's what what they submitted:

    http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn85834165&docId=FTK20130131072359#docIndex=12&page=1

    newAkrobox.jpg

    Hmmmm.... Interesting.

    One thing I noticed right off the bat. Was the word's 'Trade Mark' are missing on this new logo.

    As far as this box goes. I don't see the metal clips on the corners. I guess also they would have to have the 'choke hazard' on it somewhere. ???

    I always wondered how this place was able to get away with doing this.

    http://www.zazzle.com/csnider/gifts

    Thanks for the better link and the extra pic. Wow. That's incredible that they would be allowed to lay legal claim on someone else's old logo.

    Before this I wouldn't have seen any impediment to Craig making Akro shirts at Zazzle. No one owned the trademark on the logo (I presume). Anyone and everyone could use it for fun repro items (I presume). Now, Rhyne owns it and Craig's shirt project and repro box projects could be in violation of the law?

    So .... did the patent office just not recognize it as someone else's old logo? Or is there nothing wrong with taking someone's old logo as your own, legally and exclusively as long as you pay the fee and express a credible plan to use it in commerce?

  3. After a company goes out of business it's natural they would let their trademarks lapse. So then if the trademark has lapsed then lots of people could theoretically use it for their projects, right?

    It doesn't make sense that someone else could take ownership of it ... unless it was sold to them by the owner. Master acquired rights to the Akro name after Akro closed. So if Master passed the rights on to someone else and Rhyne & Son received it that way, then that sounds odd but okay.

    But if this is a case of someone scooping up expired trademarks ... that seems wrong somehow. Like trying to copyright something which is already in the public domain.

    Any lawyers here who could set me straight on this?

×
×
  • Create New...