Jump to content

Ric

Supporting Member
  • Posts

    10791
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    267

Everything posted by Ric

  1. Here's my small contribution to the mix. I'm pretty sure they're all Alley . . . -Ric
  2. I'm with Al on the great looking marbles - another very successful run I'd say. And a really nice array of colors and styles too! -Ric
  3. Everybody knows . . . I like 'em swirly. And those are some of the finest swirls I've ever seen - the colors are absolutely beautiful. Thanks for showing them. -Ric
  4. On those patches, I think it's the champagne base that does it - something about that subtle color in contrast with the others. At least that's how I see it. And great pics BTW. -Ric
  5. And I usually associate the translucent fuzzy edges with Master too. -Ric
  6. That is a nice looking Rainbo, I like 'em with a little twist. -Ric
  7. And thanks to all who went over there to help out! -Ric
  8. And you can bet, he'll NEVER forget that experience. Pretty cool Grandparents I'd say. -Ric
  9. No doubt Bill . . . some of the sweetest marbles ever made, and those are some great examples. I especially like that light blue and yellow one in the first pic - the chalky's pretty sweet too. Are those some kind of Tater Bug variation in the 4th pic? And a sweet rarity in the 5th pic too. VERY NICE! -Ric
  10. Hey Janice, Just a word of caution . . . Peltiers normally have a a really clear base with zero bubbles, and some Heatons and Asians can look similar. Truth is, I'm not sure those are all Pelts - glass, color and structure don't look right on some of them, IMHO. The darker blue and white one lower right might be Pelt though. -Ric
  11. Yeah, I like the blue and green based swirls too. The stripes on some remind me of bacon. -Ric P.S. I like your Avatar!
  12. Hi Folks, I hope you'll grant me some leeway here, but Janice (Delmer) posted some really nice looking marbles over in the ID section. They look Navarre/Leighton to me but we could really use some expert help over there. Please help here and here and, finally, here. Thanks, -Ric
  13. Nothing like a well-used marble bag to bring back good memories. I think I had one that was similar too, but I'm pretty sure I'd be in the "big brother" age bracket. -Ric
  14. Hey Steve, Not to step on your thread, but I thought you might like this 31/32" MK hybrid four color horseshoe cat. -Ric
  15. Nice . . . really great group! -Ric
  16. Happy Birthday Dave! I wish you many more . . . Birthdays and marbles! -Ric
  17. Yeah Janice, I'd say you've done good with the micas. I have only ever found one in the wild, and it's the only one I've got - pretty nice though. -Ric
  18. Yeah, I've seen a few of those - pretty Tiger Eye-like, IMHO, which makes me think they might be earlier than the more commonly referred to Blackies. -Ric
  19. Thanks Steph, The only real info I have on a timeline is from AMMM, where they suggest that Whities are a later addition to the Vitro line than Blackies. And I agree with you . . . some of the Whities have pretty deep ribbons, but I'm not sure they all do. As for "the blue blackie just left of center in your photograph", that one is as on the surface as all the others - just more thickly applied. In fact, I don't think I've seen any Blackies with any real depth to the ribbons. -Ric
  20. Steve, Why all the buisiness, instead of just the answer? Of course, I know Dave has vast experience and is a heck-of-a marble guy, and I assume he's thought about these issues. But given all the different glass and materials used in the runs, I simply wondered if he had prior experience with these glasses and materials, or whether they were tested prior to their use. A simple, honest and serious question. And what I get in return is a whole bunch of . . . . with an answer buried somewhere in it - I think. -Ric
  21. I really like the new Jabos and my son is downright CRAZY about them, so we have many. I don't know much about glass, but I do like to learn, and I find it sad that any serious or critical discussion of these marbles is near impossible. I think that oldmarblenut's initial message may have been a bit alarmist, and could probably have been worded better, but I think his premise is not unreasonable. With all of the great color and additive combos that have been produced, it seems reasonable that COE might be a concern. And I am sort of surprised that nobody involved in the production of these marbles has yet addressed his point. It's seems pretty simple to me . . . Was any testing done, or was COE considered when purchasing or combining the glass for these marbles? No dissing, no accusations, no alarm - just a question. -Ric
  22. O.K. It just seemed to make sense to me that if white Blackies were run with the other Blackies, the white base might be cheaper glass, since it would normally be covered anyway. OTOH, if black Whities were run with the rest of the Whities, I might expect a better quality of white base glass to be used on them, since most of the marble was white. And while you are correct that there is much variation of non-white color within each group, I am not so sure that the same can be said for the base glass, at least in those that I have. Compare, for example, row 1 marble 3 to row 2 marble 4, and also, marble 1 in rows 3 & 4 to marble 2 in row 3. I think the base is distinctly different, at least in hand. If not, then do we call all white-based black-ribboned marbles Blackies, even if they are in Whitie packaging? Or maybe we just don't classify them as Whities or Blackies, since you can't tell them apart? I didn't think these two types were made at the same time, but of course, I could be wrong on that. Thanks, -Ric
  23. Real nice find Duffy, the colors are sweet. -Ric
×
×
  • Create New...