Jump to content

Steph

Supporting Member Moderator
  • Posts

    29378
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    40

Posts posted by Steph

  1. Here's a sample of CAC Pastels. Pete's pix (or Block's?) of marbles which WERE Pete's but now are Ken's? Uh oh, that got complicated. LOL

    Anyway, pastels is a collectors name which sprang up so naturally and immediately from Block's literal description of them that it was thought to be Christensen's own name for the marbles.

    capastels5lg.jpg

    A related thread:

    Cac Pastels

    (I'm hoping to collect the best known Pastels pics here because I'm having difficulty accessing them at the archive.org site.)

  2. Another case of terminology getting in the way imho.

    Folks are getting hung up on the word "bee" instead of talking about the mibs Ray is thinking of. Semdot focused on it - on the mibs that is - 6 ribbon mibs with the distinct red and black vs. 4 ribbon mibs with the red and black running together.

    ,,, or something like that ,,, if I understand correctly ,,, [insert favorite humble statement] ,,,

  3. Gorgeoso!

    I think it's 3 vanes. flattened with a steamroller. a tiny little glass elf inside driving around on his tiny little steamroller (without the steam because that probably wouldn't work out too well in hot glass) and flattening it. Maybe sprinkling a little extra magic dust into the blue vane to turn it into a purply hybrid.

    or could it be a flattened six vaner?

    weerd. i love it!

  4. Ooh good pic for a question I've been meaning to ask. ya know what gives newer marbles an oily sheen? aw heck, I don't know personally, but I think it might be high sodium content of the glass? Recently read something which seemed maybe to imply that. Now seems an okay time to ask.

    BZPEm4wBmkKGrHgoH-EEjlLl0TJBKlsSBBk.jpg

  5. Bingo! Er, I mean, here's a follow-up on the ever so important sparkler question. I know you were holding your breath. :P

    Looking at a jobbers price list for 1933-1934 . . . sparklers are listed. They were part of the Special Assortment. From the flyer:

    NOTE:---This assortment consists of ROYALS, GLASSIES, SPIRALS and SPARKLERS, packed either as an assortment or as individual types, as specified.

    The price on the No. 0 size was $2.40 for 1000 marbles. So Sparklers cost less than Moss Agates - the price on the No. 0 size for Moss Agates was $3.00 per 1000. The most expensive marbles in the list were "the brand new and exclusive Akro Carnelian" at $4.00 per 1000. "Conceded to be the best glass marbles manufactured." :-) Wonder who "conceded" that. :-)

    (Thanks to George S. for a copy of the ad.)

  6. Thanks Dani. And John.

    Yes, I was trying to sort out the patches - or at least see if there was any chance for me to do it! - so I sidestepped the swirly or corky moss agates. cool.gif

    p.s., did you know that to Master their Meteors were translucent? Some mibs I've been calling Cloudies I shouldn't have. I made an edit about that above. Master included "Moss Agate" style mibs under both names in their ads. Also, the ads have at least one pic of what I thought were Cloudies but they called 'em Meteors.

  7. Here's one of those topics I think I once was on my way to understanding but instead of getting more focussed it has gotten more fuzzy. I could try to recreate the info - in order to ask the question "intelligently" - but I've decided to just toss it out on the table and see what happens.

    The U.S. has exported marble-making technology, right?

    Some individuals or companies may have done it, but also the U.S. government in an official foreign relations way? Frank Sellers is cited in AMMM (p. 38) as saying his grandfather Lawrence Alley was invited by the government to go to Japan to help them set up marble factories but his health prevented him from going.

    And I think I also heard about this in connection with marbles made in South America. But I'm not sure.

    Anyone know the scoop on this?

  8. Greg:

    Astonishment.jpg

    Way to wake us up!

    Ann:

    I'm guessing that box is at least partially backfilled / mis-filled. By someone who thought the ox meant Akro? maybe? Or maybe those were just their very favorite marbles and they put them in their favorite marble box without worrying about maker? (lol) or something like that . . .

    Here's a horsehair ox thread. Horsehair Examples?

    Kevin: how much do you miss that box!?

  9. No, it's not about "Edna" she happened to be the one who tryed to group everyones opinions together saying "it's all our opinions", the subject was.... IMHO, no IOHO.

    Individual opinions, not groups.

    Why can't people stick to the point? Why does every comment lead to chaos?

    Pick a road and stick to it, life is alot easyer.

    Lets hear more about these exotics, fakes?? sounds like a better thread to start, actualy meaningful subject matter.

    You misread Edna's meaning. IMHO. Why would you assume she was saying that anyone was speaking an opinion for the whole? Of course she meant that each person is stating their own opinion. Hence it is redundant to couch one's remarks in the IMHO ending. Or something along those lines.

    Why does "every comment" lead to chaos? Well possibly partly because of the tendency of people to overgeneralize.

    More definitely because of people misreading. It becomes exponentially worse when people make harsh criticisms based on their misreading.

    Regardless of Edna's meaning, or your reading of it, and regardless of whether my reading of her post was correct, your post was hostile. It was in direct opposition to the tolerance you seemed possibly to be calling for.

×
×
  • Create New...