Dfay1983

Here's a group pic. Why is the blue so different than the others?

The blue is just... different..

Where do you guys think this one fits in?

Big guy. 25/32"

Gotta love um

Bottom guy there is a little over 3/4''

I like this one a lot

What's funny is that for some reason you think this is a Vacor. I absolutely agree with you that IDing takes practice. And shoot you might have even collected longer than I have. But based on the swirl patterns cut lines and countless hours I have looked at Peltiers I am going to have to go with Peltier on this one buddy. No hard feelings if you disagree with me . Marble on bro

Hmmm. Keep collecting. You'll get better at IDing. takes practice!

I love patches here's a few.

New arrival

End of run variant?

I have yet to see a more stunning slag.

Don't forget the sub-wasp ed!

I'm not totally sure how common a panda type with a dark purple base is, but I don't really see to many being shared. I think they're pretty cool.

Names are overrated:)

Sorry about all the typos I was talking into my phone! LOL and thank you everyone for your input this Marbles been curiosity of mine since I got it last year

Those are all very valid points. It appears though that only the red or majenta transparent or purple-ish color. Now imagine if the Opaque or green is centralized in the center of the Marble. The red base like with most other Peltier Marbles of this era would be forced to the surface of the marble and create a thin layer, muddying the appearance of the dark secondary glass. This would drastically change the overall appearance of the marble to the dull color of the marble in question. As far as the eyelashes are concerned. If you notice they are not attributed to the cut, but the act of the layers of the opaque glass folding on top of each other. like you would see on the cuffs of a pleated skirt. I do see your point that master did use this Color combination quite regularly. But as you stated in the end of your statement there are plenty of marbles with similar attributes and sometimes it is hard to tell them apart. I am simply trying to identify this marble based on the cutlines very similar class flow patterns and undeniable characteristics shown. To give you an example. I took the same pictures of this marble and simply adjusted the Hugh saturation to 100%. This is the results I got. Since it's pretty hard to tell them apart when you do this the marble in question is the one on the left.

You guys really don't see the resemblance? So is the other Marble a master as well then?

The structure is nearly identical

Couple more

I've had trouble placingb His Marble for a while. At first glance it resembles maser. This one has muddy base and is completely opaque. You think perhaps it lts I'm the same family!

I've had trouble placingb His Marble for a while. At first glance it resembles maser. This one has muddy base and is completely opaque. You think perhaps it lts I'm the same family!