Jump to content

Alan

Members
  • Posts

    2553
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Alan

  1. Your understanding is correct.
  2. Deep red glass was originaly formulated with gold dissolved in an acid. The same was true (IIRC) for pink - just at a lesser amount of gold. Not all reds required the use of gold. I think that the use of gold was discontinued in the 1930s or 40s by using selenium - and later a copper formula... both which were cheaper. U.S. marble manufacturers would have been restricted from using gold during WWII.
  3. Agree with Mike above - pink glass formulas were expensive (and marbles were cheap). Galen's point is also a good one.
  4. Richard Clark makes some very appealing designs. Here is some of his work that I own:
  5. They are micas - made by Bill Murray.
  6. Lundberg Studios Van Gogh Sunset: Lundberg Studios Sea Crest: Lundberg Studios Starry Night: Bill Murray: Bill Murray (purple outer bands and purple dichro on green solid core):
  7. There is no way of knowing the answer to that supposition. If I had to guess - based on the shape of the rollers, the fact that they are smooth and constantly in motion (unlikely to hold metal salts well) - if it were a one-time occurence - probably fewer than 12. If it happened 3-5 times over a year - then 3-5 times that. Then divide by the high percentage that were lost to time and/or discarded and never dug from a dump site. It is really a freak/chance occurence - essentially an unintended and unwanted contamination of a marble whose production design isn't supposed to look like that. Manufacturers were pretty good at culling their production pieces and dumping the rejects.
  8. If your aventurine is strictly at the surface like mine - then my guess of glass colorant salts on the rollers and some hot marbles picking it up seem all the more likely. Otherwise there would be some in the green or clear matrix. Thanks for the pic.
  9. If you have an example I'd be interested in a photo or two. I've been thinking about the unusual surface layer of "aventurine" and why it would be that thick, right on the surface, that color etc. and how that would occur in the glass pot. That led me to a (completely factually unsupported) guess that the machine operator may have been feeding colorant (metal salts) into the pot by shovel (standard method) and could have dropped some on the rollers. When the next few marbles went through the rollers - they would have picked up the loose dry powder - which was then fused to the glass (but only on the surface). This color of "aventurine" isn't the normal color we see in subsurface glass and is far too dense....hard to imagine any other reason it would be on the surface only. Anyway...thats my unsupported speculation.
  10. Thought I would share this Akro Sparkler with a little more than half of the surface covered with a dense emerald green aventurine:
  11. If one orders glass (boro etc) these days this is a sample of what is sold as Pistachio glass:
  12. A large Geoff Beetem air trap: A tiny Harry & Wendy Bessett Eisenglas (mica inclusion in clear):
  13. A few more "clears": Mike E. Shadows: Mike E. UV Galaxies: JD Anderson Pee Wee Jellyfish:
  14. Bob: The white tri-level solid core at 12 o'clock in the photo measures 2.25": Here it is with the smallest - a 15/32" divided core: This is the divided core pee wee: The large green and yellow divided core pictured on Page 1 of this thread comes in at 2 3/8" dia.: Alan
×
×
  • Create New...