Steph

LIzzy posted these once. They might have gotten a Vitro ID at the time. Later they were at least tentatively ID-ed as Kokomo.

Here's an oddball which was thought to be Pelt when I posted it for ID long ago.

A sweet slag that I wish didn't have a giant blow out on the other side:

That looks like candy. Clearly you were a good boy this year.

Congratulations! 1960, huh? That antique who earned that one isn't much older than me. I don't suppose you were lucky enough to learn the name of the person who wore that in the national tournament ....

What a wonderful quest! Oh ... I see the spiral now. Brown on this side of the plate, right? The pattern really does look like it would have been swirled there by hand ... like a cake decoration.

What happened at the end in the glow in the dark segment where there was something really bright moving around?

That's a very nice blue shade. That's a different shade from the blue I know about. Intriguing. Thank you for that lead. I got some nice bright Marble Kings fluorescent marbles -- the uranium kind. But actual glow-in-the-dark? The only ones I can think of in that category are here: http://www.landofmarbles.com/hom018.html They have glow-in-the-dark bits inside.

This box? Or should I keep looking for one filled with just red and white marbles? (fuzzy memory but one of those is out there, right?) Source

Stripes! Who knew I could like stripes as much as flames?

Aw, now I can't remember which marbles Clyde meant as the Asians which could get mistaken in CAC groups and we can't ask.

You have a lot of Alley swirls, some Peltier Rainbos, some Vitros, some game marbles, some clearies and the cat's eyes you noted. The solid-colored marbles aren't worth much at all unless you can get confirmation that some of them might be some particular recognizable type such as flinties or moonies. Or since some of the solids are fluorescent under blacklight you might be able to attract some buyers from among the vaseline glass collecting community.

Bless your heart, Chuck! (There were broken image links and he quietly fixed them. ) This isn't that close of a comparison, not marbles that people are likely to confuse with each other, but the similarity in the motion of the swirling on these large marbles made decades apart has always intrigued me:

This marble needs some more love.

Just a reminder. If anyone sees a thread that they think is turning into one which ought to be saved in the archives, add "keeperthread" to one of your posts in the thread. One word. That will let me find the thread when I do a search later for threads which need to be archived.

Bump ... this came up in a search. Thought it might be fun to see if anyone had anything to add before I send it to the archives. keeperthread

The texture of the white, the lavender shade, and the cutline I'm seeing at the top left of the top photo is making me wonder if it might be a Vacor. At 7/10 of an inch, I'm also still considering double ingot as a possibility. While leaving open the possibility of the crease merely being a deep fold.

Is that shade accurate? I don't know the maker but maybe someone else will recognize the shade. P.s., what size is it? A couple of the views are making me wonder if it is a double ingot.

That's definitely cool! Big ol' bubble. As to ID ... I don't know if it can be done. Can be nigh unto impossible to pin down a maker on a Transparent Swirl.

*desperately seeking adjectives*

"Fun" no longer is the right word for You, Me & the Apocalypse. I will say no more. Except if you haven't been watching it, don't start now. Just two episodes left out of ten, and you don't want to see the end before you see the beginning. I give the series a 10 so far.

I think we can allow it.