No kidding. That place should be on the historical register. How could they close it? Guess it's not trendy enough for the people who can afford to shop there?
Wonder if they'll bring in people who know about treasures to help carry stuff away. Or if it'll professionals who just go in and shovel things into steel garbage bins without caring about content.
To the best of my understanding that would be a mist.
Now that I've said yes, maybe that will get someone out of the woodwork to explain how it is not. But it sure looks like one to me.
For some reason I wanna say Heaton on this one, but I can't remember why. Maybe it's Bogard instead. It has at least three shades of orange-y-ness. Four vanes. A lot of transparency/translucence.
I'm wondering why it was in with the CA's. Did you have reason to be sure it belonged there? That's what I'm curious about.
P.s., I agree with calling it snotty even though it's perty.
Hey, guys, I'm right on this one!
The Mandrake marble I posted shows a diaper fold.
Here is Alan's diaperfold diagram:
The seam is the top of the diaper and the little baby legs come out of the holes on the side.
hehe ... no poetry
That looks strange to me. I'd be tempted to think "remelt" but I wouldn't panic unless I heard that from Galen. Maybe it got hung up on the rollers? From what I understand, the term "Diaper Fold" has fallen out of vogue. I still like the term but I don't see one there. A marble would need a single fairly neat seam for me to want to call it a Diaper Fold. And a nice smooth looping action visible from the side.
. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . (marble photos from Manddrakes' auctions)