Jump to content

Steph

Supporting Member Moderator
  • Posts

    29229
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    36

Everything posted by Steph

  1. Here is an interesting biographical piece. It has errors. For example the birthdate is wrong, and one glaring omission is his affiliation with Rosenthal. But it's still kinda cool. The radio information is new to me. I'm inclined to believe that part's true. My transcription from the book isn't perfect. I didn't have a good copy to look at. I might try to clean it up later. Who's Who in American Jewry, Vol. 3 Julius Schwartz, Solomon Aaron Kaye, John Simons Jewish Biographical Bureau, 1939 p. 815
  2. Love the board! Oh and the marbles aren't bad either. ;-)
  3. Totally okay! Easier to see. No problemo! (p.s., welcome )
  4. No. Too white. P.s., if someone posted that for ID my guess might have been Akro on that one.
  5. Alley on the Bull's Eye bag. According to the latest and most consistent information I've heard. The Pressman/Alley connection was a strong one.
  6. When Don posted this one I got the feeling that it might be unusual. I don't know though. Master Made Bag
  7. Thanks for the kudos! Been a rough day. And rougher for you than me. I liked that name game thread. Ran out of steam though. Am looking forward to the show and tell.
  8. Blue Angel, Red Angel, Green Angel Photo by Mibcapper:
  9. Here's a photo (Mibcapper's, I believe) which includes a green angel. They have a tan custardy base. I think they are essentially a six-ribbon marble, but sometimes it's hard to tell because of how the ribbons smear and split each other. I'm pretty sure it's not a vaseline base, at least I'm pretty sure the one red one I sold didn't have one. I think the blue angel was named first, by Smitty, after the Blue Angels flight squadron.
  10. To me they look like they're right on the cusp.
  11. Worth waiting for! Beautiful!
  12. Pearlized Patches I couldn't easily find any pearlized patches to show someone, so I hunted and finally found this classic from Patry. Here's her description with the photo.
  13. 1932-1992. Longest lived U.S. marble company that I can think of. Their name even lives on as a legal entity under Jabo. (If I'm not mistaken.) That most of their marbles are so affordable is part of their charm. New collectors and longtimers can both find something to hunt for. Nah, it's okay. You learned something making it. And you got some good comments. If you really really want it closed, I think I can do that. Don't see any harm in it staying open though.
  14. I just had to pull a major edit. Doh. I thought I finally had those "cat's eyes" figured out. Well, thanks everyone for playing! I got the Pelt answer I came for. I better quit before I'm too far behind.
  15. Yeah, I think it's a challenge to figure out what to take away from it. DID Pink or Sellers know something about those handmade marbles we don't know? Or did they maybe not understand how the handmades were made? And what about those "first American glass marbles"? Also we've discussed that line of weird "cat's eyes" before - at length in at least one past thread - after which I think people walked away without feeling there were answers. But someone mentioned they might actually be what were called cat's eyes back then, maybe the ones Vacor made in the 1940's. So there might be more good info in the article than I at first imagined. Just gotta pick it out. . . . . Edit: Someone had actually attributed the Vacor claim to Cathy Runyan, but I just emailed her about it and she said no, those weren't the Vacors she saw at the factory. Darn it, I thought I had figured those out.
  16. I can't choose. I'm still trying to get over Vitro being left out of the top group.
  17. Well, the info might have come straight from Sellers Peltier. Supposedly some of the marbles did. And some from Berry Pink. But even marble company owners have been known to make mistakes about things which happened 3 decades earlier. So I still approach the info with caution. Here's the rest of the article joemarbles posted: (The article gets the date wrong for when the first marble machines were made.)
  18. Muchas gracias. 1955 is still quite a ways removed from 1928, so I appreciate 2nd and 3rd opinions.
  19. I just reread this article from 1955. It says Peltier introduced "Rainbows" in 1928. Mike also mentioned that date once in connection with Pelt's "agates". So is this a pretty solid date for the NLR's? Posted a while back by joemarbles: (pretty big, might need to click twice for full size) Thanks.
  20. Thin brownish strands of color. Check out: http://marbleconnection.com/topic/14082-ohhhwilllburrrrrrr/ http://marbleconnection.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=8636
  21. I wanna see! What size are the images? Maybe you can add them in the gallery and then use the address there to post 'em here.
×
×
  • Create New...