Steph

Pressman's version - Hop Ching - was mentioned in society page reports starting at least by August 1938, which would indicate some amount of fame. But it's sort of interesting that Burnstine advertised a Chinese Checkers game in the June 1938 edition of Playthings while Pressman did not mention the game. Was it just not that important to Pressman at the time? Or was there some other reason not to advertise the game which was such a boon to their business? such as they only started their Hop Ching push after that Playthings went to print? Whatever the reason, Burnstine featured the game while Pressman's ad was more along the lines of "we are here". Here are some Hop Ching ads from Aug. and Sept. 1938. (click to enlarge) . . . .

Yeah, I would have seen that site sometime, if not yesterday. It was linked in this thread about Lawrence Brown's version of the game. Marble Bag... Brown Manufacturing Co. The story told about Brown there makes it seems as if he was the only maker from 1937 to 1943. We know that's not true. I think it's sorta like how during the twilight years of their careers, various marble company presidents were given credit for having mechanized marble making. The Chinese Checkers game was huge. It's sorta natural that stories might be embellished about its development and promotion. Well here's an ad for Brown's version, Chinker Chek. Here's the Pressman version, Hop Ching. Ooops, lol. I didn't prep one of those yet. It's not as if I'm anti-Pressman. Really I'm not! Pressman sold marbles. They helped Alley become and/or stay a major player. I gotta like 'em. Just trying to get the Chinese Checkers story straight. :-) Here are some others I did prep. (click to enlarge) Another Friedel: A local color pic: (by the way, parties where Chinese Checkers in its various incarnations were played made the society pages quite a bit. :-) A lithographed version involving some quantity of steel. (there's been some question about when steel versions were produced.) Another name variant while I'm in the neighborhood. One more. Burnstine's Hop Chek. one one more, the earliest ad I've seen so far. Sorta boring as far as the Chinese Checkers ref. But cute ad for the Fortune game. lol

The JC's I know of are Jerry Capel, Jason Compagni and Joe Crisanti. I don't know their styles. The names came from the list I was given at GA. The GA discussion of this particular marble turned out kinda cool - giving a good feel for why the signature might not be enough to make the ID.

I'm not sure if that's one I saw but I saw something like that. Lots of sites quoting same source(s).

fwiw, the question I saw wasn't why were there so many bidders. It was why were there so many bids. There was something suspicious in the bids. There appear to have been 5 people or fewer bidding on the two auctions. That is, there were 5 distinct ebay accounts involved. One of the bidders placed almost 100 bids total, pushing the bids up, up, up. That CAN be an innocent bidder uncertain of how high they want to go and doing it in increments. However, it's still disconcerting.

1.423 (again! LOL)

Neat. I don't have a date on it either. It might be the less than or equal to 1948 version mentioned here. Funny that they don't mention "Ching Ling" though. Wonder where they get the 1948 date from. Maybe that's when Kayson's Novelty Co. ceased to exist under that name. Here's a press release and ad from what appears to be Friedel's early push for recognition. By the way, do you know what you'd be playing if you were playing "Chinese Checkers" in 1923? . . . . Mah Jongg.

Happy Birthday Leroy ! ! !

I'm getting conflicting information about the introduction of Chinese Checkers to America. Some sources give Pressman credit, with a date of 1928, but that seems out of line with other records. If Pressman did come up with it in 1928 there sure was a delayed reaction before it caught on. Does anyone have evidence for earlier than December 1935? By someone other than the J. F. Friedel Co. of Syracuse, NY?

Here's a comparison of the images. The Skeezix is a better copy than the Sandy. Of course it's still fake. by that way, anyone here familiar with a peerless patch with a yellow patch like that?

Whoa, yeah Mark, that bid history is a beaut. (edit: oops, sorry, Craig!) Bill, look at the blue. It's the most obvious MK structure - modern Rainbow style not Peerless patch. Blue patch on either end.

Oh yes, did I mention . . . HAPPY BIRTHDAY GIRL! Have a great day tomorrow!

I really can't tell whether it is a slag or a swirl. Could the red be oxblood? and by the way, HAPPY BIRTHDAY!

very VERY nice! It's almost like it's your birthday or something! SWEET MIBS!

I never knew that. I totally thought it was fancy painted, rebuilt cars. doh! Until you suggested Kokomo had a plant for them. double doh!

That link isn't working for me. This one hopefully will. http://shop.ebay.com/merchant/marblealan p.s. YUM!

Lovely, and completely new to me.

My favorite color is somewhere in here.

Nifteroony ! ! !

Congratulations Ruth!

What's a Mopar?

I know I got it this time! Cleveland! Right?

That's Champion = winner. Not Champion = Champion Agate Co. Like Champion Jr. not equal Champion Agate Co.

Thanks. That's cool. Meshes with and fleshes out my general impressions. "Agate" types. Yes, I know that vocabulary. Good distinction from the Onyx types. LOL. Anyway, here are pix of a possibly 1932-ish package containing feathered slags together with tweeners, i.e., "marbles which some call rainbos and some say look like they might be from the NLR era" . . *inhale deeply*.

The little bit I know is that the date seems funky for new slag developments. Not impossible, but in competition with other developments at Peltier. Mike what do you know about when NLRs were made? My best guess is that they were on their way out in 1932. The mibs I think of as "tweeners" seem to be popping up in packaging from about that year. On the other hand, I think that slags and tweeners have been found together in the same 1932-ish packaging.