What percentage of the Kokomo ID's that you see do you actually believe in?
There are some very standard Kokos. And then there are all the rest. I see people seeking Koko ID's and often getting them based on as little as a shade of red as it appears on a computer screen, for example. And I wonder how much people on both sides of the ID really believe it. The hopeful people with the marble or the helpful people with the ID.
My thought is that I don't feel at all comfortable putting a "might be Koko" marble in the same container as my "pretty darn sure these are Koko" marbles. I don't feel so strongly any more about, say, Marble Kings which look like Vitro All-Reds. They can go together. But Kokos I still feel strongly about.
I get the feeling that a lot of people take "might be Koko" as "good chance Koko" and then feel comfortable putting it in their pretty-darn-sure Koko cabinet without any explanatory notes.
This seems to be a shift from when I started collecting, when for example I got praise from Chuck Brandstetter for biting my tongue whenever I kinda sorta wanted to bring up "might be Koko" in an ID. The lesson I got from him was that "might be" should be translated as "probably not" and then the marble should be put in some other cabinet and the K-word should never be uttered again.
There are few people whose Koko ID's I trust, and even with those people I'd feel better if they were able to say they got their similar marbles from a Kokomo dumpsite or the estate of a Kokomo employee, or something as nice as that.