Jump to content

Steph

Supporting Member Moderator
  • Posts

    29123
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    31

Everything posted by Steph

  1. We need Debra Stanley-Lapic to post her shooters! I'll send her an SOS!
  2. It has been suggested to me that there were some Peltiers which looked like those red and white ones (which look a little mossy to me). Can anyone confirm? And if so do you know what they were called?
  3. A little more pure "FWIW": The reference to sulfur might, strong emphasis on might, might refer to the way the porcelain figures were made. Or how they were made in the early days. How the molds were made for shaping the figures. Part of the process of molding them might have involved sulfur. Here is the title of a work from 1775, "A catalogue of impressions in sulphur of antique and modern gems from which pastes are made and sold". That appears to be purely a catalog. Not describing method. Just letting people know what figures were available.
  4. I agree with Galen. I've seen opals (synthetic?) used inside marbles to good effect. And metal. I don't know what terminology is used for that type of inclusion. I believe the word sulphide refers specifically to the clay figures. I did some research for how the name "sulphide" came into use. My best guess so far, obtained with the help of some paperweight collectors, is that it came to us from the French, as "sulfure", in the early part of the 1900's. Inlaying porcelain in glass appears to go back to the late 1700's. Other items such as ivory go as far back as 1584.
  5. A Gropper box from a recent Morphy auction. Box It's a New York box (as opposed to Ottawa). One row is something other than slags. Photos from the auction: (click to enlarge)
  6. Do we even know what the "M" stands for? In 1917, the M. Gropper & Sons company was said to consist of Harry Gropper and Abraham S. Gropper. From a patent for a "Liquid Pistol". Patent number: 1238733 Filing date: Sep 16, 1916 Issue date: Sep 1917 In 1901, the names given for the M. Gropper & Sons company were Harry & Samuel & Abraham. The Trow (formerly Wilson's) copartnership and corporation directory of New York City, Vol. 49 p. 195 Harry had a son named Meyer. At least there was a young Gropper named Meyer, and Harry was listed as nearest relative on his draft registration from 1918. Meyer was a packer at M. Gropper & Sons. (click to enlarge) (So maybe Meyer was Harry's father's name?) While I'm at it, Gropper appears to have been (re)incorporated in 1923. From the NY Times, 10/4/23, under the headline of "New Incorporations", one of the listings is:
  7. Is there anything else of significance we should/could know about Gropper? Here's a bit from another site: source: Antique Toy Archive
  8. Here's a link to a Gropper box at a recent Morphy auction. Box It's a Gropper New York box (as opposed to Ottawa). Morphy's description says it contains a row of American Agates. Curious about your thoughts about it all, but perhaps starting with whether you agree on the American Agate call. Morphy's description: Photos from the auction: (click to enlarge) Thanks.
  9. By Peerless Opalescent, do you mean Acme Realer? Acme Realers are famous for their bases having a grain to them, and turning something like transparent orange when backlit. edit: here is a thread I started once to study different types of marbles with a translucent white base. http://marbleconnection.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=7863 Note: the understanding of what it is to be a "Cloudie" might be changing. They might have at least originally been designed as single color translucent marbles. But that's a different subject. Additional note: I've looked up some old ads. Master advertised "Cloudys" as "solid colors". Seems pretty definitive. The marbles I've been calling "Cloudies" appear to be what Master called Meteors.
  10. Someone has asked a question here: http://marbleconnection.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=7044 If anyone would like to play along, feel free to help out.
  11. Hi Ken. Sorry for the delay in getting to these. I haven't been online much. Hi all, here is another pic from Ken, and a larger version of another group pic he sent. His note said, "Sorry for posting such a small group." . . (cute Ken, lol )
  12. Pretty cool. My guess would be clay on that red one. But take that with a grain of salt.
  13. My widow better not get remarried. That's all I can say. Just playin'.
  14. Ugh. Thanks for the imagery, everyone. Thanks ever so much for bumping this, Gene!
  15. Sweet! Thanks for sharing the news!!!
  16. No, I couldn't figure out how to drag the pix at ebay. Used this auction to test it out: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300484793652 But I did finally see what Al saw with the images here at MC. I right clicked on the correct spot I guess and I was able to save a pic. I'm not quite sure where the correct spot is. lol. Tried to replicate it on another pic and failed. But went for it again on a 3rd pic and got it. edit: when I right clicked on that pic at ebay, I got an option to View Selection Source. Some code popped up. In the code there was a .jpg address. I copied the address, pasted it in another window and the picture came up. And I was able to right click and save it from there. *whew deep breath*
  17. Are you able to download pix from ebay? I can download pix from lots of places but not from ebay. Well, not from Marble Connection either for that matter. I mean not from the Marble Connection attachments. I could right click and download the photo above. But if I want to get an attached photo from MC I have to go back to Explorer. edit: Oh wait .... you said drag. I haven't tried dragging. Let me check that out.
  18. I generally use Firefox for browsing. Firefox won't let me save the pix. So when I want a pic, I go to Explorer. If that fails and I really really really want it, I take a screenshot.
×
×
  • Create New...