This seller gives a different state as their address, whatever that might mean.
Here's the auction. I guess linking to it can't count as a spoiler, since everyone seems to think it's already smelly.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=180472476813
Not the same guy - unless he's using a different ID, which wouldn't be the first time that happened.
Hmmmm ... I should go look at that. Sometimes his alter egos have the same style. That's how I caught one of them.
I think you could be right about that version of the flinties being earlier than popeyes. I'm not totally certain though that they didn't overlap, so I'll have to leave confirmation to someone else.
Now that you mention other makers, that looks kinda like a Vitro Yellow Jacket at the lower left. Sometimes things slip in, even in legit lots, but this is rather a mix, ain't it.
Yup, Fleabay.
We should learn from them!
I do have a basement. And some old cans. And some Jabos.
Pretty sure I can get some dirt to put the cans in.
Hey, I'm almost ready for business!
heehee
Some people appreciate a little razzle dazzle. I GUESS! LOLOL
They like getting caught up in the excitement, even if they don't really believe it. I GUESS!
Just a theory.
He has a Yahoo group called the Marble Collector's Club. I don't know if it is active. I've seen a few interesting things in his photo albums but have never tried to post there.
That's not photoshop!
I can see how someone could think it is, but these marbles are for real. Check out this website. It'll blow you away.
http://www.glasskitchen.com/
White Pelts! oh yeah!
Makes sense.
I still know relatively little about slags so that's a FWIW sentiment but the double compartment bag which I posted in a couple of threads yesterday has feathered slags and it seems to be from a post-Gropper time. Berry Pink filed for the patent on that bag in 1931. He was working for Rosenthal at the time. (I'll try to make this be the last time I post this bag this week. ;-)
Thank you for the marble mail. You know who you are. I don't know if you want your name mentioned so I'll leave that up to you! But thanks! I thought it was going to be one certain marble, which was already awesome. This assortment is going to be fun to go through. Brightened my day. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
One thing which has stopped me from presenting the info I have found about the use of the oxblood name in the 1800's is that most of it is interlaced in fairly technical material. People's eyes would glaze over. (pun acknowledged if not intended)
But there really is a lot of material on copper-based oxblood from the 19th and early 20th century. If you are interested, a lot can be found on Google.
Be open for variations in spelling, and for versions of the name as given in other languages.
Here's a cool passage from a 1918 article:
The way I read it in many places, oxblood is a color AND it has a special and long known association with glazes obtained by the use of copper.
It's not what I would label oxblood. :-)
But you knew that, right?
Were you heading some direction with this? (I hope that didn't sound antagonistic. Not meant that way. Pardon me for getting turned around. :-)