Ric

Got it - makes perfect sense. Thank Again!

I do love my little "baubles", as I call them.

Just to make sure I get this . . . Is it the thickness of the shear blade or the width of the bevel?

Excellent description/explanation - I totally get how that happens now! Thanks!

I've got all kinds of neat smooth cullet shapes from Alley but the closest thing I've ever seen to a "Loop" is a closed ring made by a molten glass stream just happening to land right. Did Craig make that Loop intentionally or was it just luck?

Yeah, "marbles" was not the right word to use here - my bad.

Looks like a Funky Vitro Helmet, IMO.

@Shamrock Marbles It's a point well made, John - a pretty common occurrence on Vitros. And now I know what to call it - a "Shadow Line", which is great. So thanks for that!

Tommy's got it!

I agree with JABO Jorkscrew.

Bit of an odd Akro Crokscrew, IMO.

It looks like a Peltier Multicolor Rainbo to me.

I'd have that one with my Ravenswoods.

JABO 2004 Fall Classics* - pretty ones, IMO. *To the best of my knowledge. Please correct me if I am wrong.

This one looks a lot like a Vacor Sunset to me.

I think that one is Another Vacor Sunset. And that purple color you see in the base glass under UV is just a reflected visible light from the UV source. I don't see any significant fluorescence in the marble. Lots of yellows will glow orange under UV, which doesn't usually mean anything significant to marble ID, although there are specific instances where it might be more useful.

I really don't know for sure, but I thought the transparent red ones were "Roosters" and the opaque ones were "Firefighters".

I think it was 1945 when they moved from Vienna to Parkersburg so I think there is a very good chance it was made at Vienna but they may have continued Conqueror production early at the Parkersburg location too so it's sort of hard to tell for sure, at least for me. One thing I do know for sure is that a true peewee Conqueror is a rare bird, indeed! I have probably gone through 6-8 gallons of conquerors since I started collecting and I have never found one.

The center, bottom and 11 o'clock marbles look Alley to me. The others may be Heaton.

It's a happy new Thuringen Thursday and I am re-posting a marble from 54 pages ago. 🙂 I gave it to a friend at the Ft. Wayne show last year - he likes the oddities even more than I do and it was totally worth it just to get a peek in his keeper box - jumpin' jimminy, man! That's all I've got to say. 🙂

I do think there are small spots of fluorescent material on these marbles, and those spots are actually fluorescing. Otherwise, I would expect the whole marble to look the same. Although, I suppose it is possible that there is just some highly reflective material on those particular spots too. But imagine walking under a "blacklight" with a white shirt on. The shirt looks purple because of reflected light from the UV source - it does not fluoresce. I think this is what Alan is saying.

It looks like a Vitro - Trilite, I think.

At this point, I still lean Akro but it could be Master. The seam in pic 4 should tell the tale but it's tough to make out, at least for me.

It's hard to believe that marble would be identified as Peltier. I sure hope it wasn't me. 🙂 Ron Shepherd pointed out the offset seams to me the first time we sat down and sorted marbles together. As I recall, it was during the second Sistersville Marble Festival. I don't exactly remember when that was but it's been a good long while.

Note: I am speaking only about marbles made at Vienna and Parkersburg locations. I am not sure about post-1987 production. Any true Vitro Peewee is VHTF and any that are not game marbles (clearies or one-color opaques) are RARE. AFAIK, Vitro never intentionally made marbles in the No. 000 size (1/2" or less), and the only No. 00 (over 1/2" to 9/16") they intentionally made were transparent or one-color opaque game marbles. So any Vitros with an intentional pattern that are 9/16" or less are uncommon. The vast majority of their patterned marbles were No. 0 (over 9/16" to 5/8") and larger. This is just my understanding. I hope someone will correct me if any of this is wrong.