Yes, I was missing something.
So you are asking in a general way about transparent colors on CAC's?
I thought you were describing the colors on your marble. Didn't see red. So wasn't sure.
NOW that's a superior. LOL
The photoshop did the trick!
Chuck seems pretty definite about the yellow patch being surrounded by red ribbons on both sides. We shared a couple of emails about them and I'm pretty sure he stood firm on that. I should go doublecheck his exact wording. He named them so I have to go with what he says there.
Here's what he said. I think he'd be okay with me posting it. I should ask, huh? LOL. No, he's said before that it's okay:
Still some debate about this one so I'll try to remember to update it if there are any big revelations but I like it!
Small scenic, 3/4". Said to have been dug personally by the seller, from a San Francisco privy. They showed a lot of other cool mibs they said they dug.
(presumably) good box:
Pavcraz style. The borders and general decoration are so different I wonder if he had a different style box to copy it from, or if this was his own design.
This is one of the cases where one has to question what constitutes a personal attack. David (marbleus1) has been taking hits since page 1 for even starting this thread. He has been specifically and broadly insulted. This has turned into one of the free-for-all threads where if we banned all who could be looked at as attackers we might be banning half of our active membership.
Here's a short little notice from 1897 announcing that the company had been incorporated.
Stone; an illustrated magazine, Volume 14, p. 630
Old news, lol, but I think it's sorta cool.
Thanks Dan. The Akro box pic in the ad looks almost real enough to pick up, but I doubt I would recognize a Cornelian in hand.
Is yours noticeably translucent?
Winnie doesn't deserve the vitriol.
And we readers don't deserve the insults to our mental capacity.
Hijackings and vendettas are both against board guidelines. I agree that Galen appears to have called Dave M and Beri liars. But he did it after being pushed into a corner. Pushing him into that corner in Winnie's thread was an insult to her efforts.
This one is being discussed at LOM right now and it's on ebay. It's small. 3/4". Said to have been dug personally by the seller, from a San Francisco privy. They showed a lot of other cool mibs they said they dug. (I'm not implying what they said isn't true, just saying "they said" coz I wasn't there when it happened.)
The so what is that Winnie took the trouble to post some neat marbles here in a thoughtful way and her thread got hijacked. Time after time some of us tried to bring it back. But showing Galen up was so important that it was worth disintegrating the thread and potentially chasing Winnie off this board.
That's so what.
It ain't cool when someone busts up one of Edna's threads. It wasn't cool to bust up Winnie's thread. Start a new thread to make your point. When you bust up someone else's thread it makes it more likely people will think badly of you and miss whatever point you think is so important to make.
in my humble opinion
"Marbles Which Exist But Are Rarely Id-Ed . . ."
, , , that's as opposed to marbles which don't exist but ARE ID-ed! lolol you know what I mean! I hope